ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

Chủ Nhật, 21 tháng 5, 2023

How Really does Debate Settlement System of WTO Work

 How Really does Debate Settlement System of WTO Work?

The dispute settlement procedures used by the World Trade Organization (WTO) are based on the GATT 1947 dispute settlement rules, which have been in place for nearly 50 years. Finding a positive solution to the dispute is the fundamental goal of this dispute resolution method. Because Vietnam is a member of the World Trade Organization, it may use the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism in disputes with other WTO members.

How Really does Debate Settlement System of WTO Work


The parties to a dispute at the World Trade Organization (WTO) will first hold consultations to come up with a mutually agreed-upon solution to the dispute (Consultation – the stage of mediation). Third parties, who are members with a significant interest and desire to participate in the dispute resolution process, may participate in each case if they feel they have a significant interest in the case and should be considered by the panel. On account of a fruitless request, a board of 3 to 5 individuals will be laid out and entrusted with looking at a specific issue in debate based on WTO rules refered to by the petitioner's country.

According to Article 12.3 of the DSU, the first thing a panel to review the complaint must do is establish a timetable for its proceedings. The contents of Article 12 and Annex 3 of the DSU are typically covered by the panel procedure, which allows for some flexibility to guarantee the quality of the report without delaying the proceedings. The parties can be more proactive in presenting evidence, bases, and arguments in their submitted documents by understanding the contents and deadlines of a timetable.

The panel will enter the internal discussion phase (deliberation) following the hearings to evaluate the assessment of relevant legal and practical issues in accordance with WTO regulations. The deliberation must be kept secret. The parties to the dispute were not present when these reports were written; rather, they were written based solely on the information that was provided and the remarks that were made earlier. Individual assessments of hearers introduced in a board report will exclude the names of speakers of such sentiments.

Within two weeks of the panel's conclusion of the mid-term review, the final report will be sent to the dispute parties. Regularly, every report of the board has extremely huge substance, to work with the investigation of audit by the redrafting body and to cite case regulation, the report should show the chapter by chapter list and sections which are discrete numbered in the request for the report. After the DSB adopts a panel report, the dispute resolution process will immediately proceed to the implementation stage if there is no appeal. The case will be reviewed at the appellate level if there is an appeal.

As a member of the World Trade Organization, Vietnam must be well-versed in the dispute resolution process and fully prepared for disputes with other WTO members in international trade disputes.

ANT Lawyers have Litigation and Dispute lawyers in Hanoi, Da Nang and Ho Chi Minh City that help clients dealing with dispute resolution and alternative dispute resolution in Vietnam.

Thứ Hai, 15 tháng 5, 2023

The Ministry of Industry and Trade Applies Anti-dumping Measures to a Table and Chair Products from China

The Ministry of Industry and Trade Applies Anti-dumping Measures to a Table and Chair Products from China

On February 13th, 2023, the Ministry of Industry and Trade issued Decision No. 235/QD-BCT on the application of official anti-dumping measures to a number of table and chair products from the People’s Republic of China (China) and terminated the investigation to apply anti-dumping measures on some furniture products from Malaysia. Accordingly, the official anti-dumping tax rate applied to the investigated goods originating from China is 21.4% for chair products and 35.2% for table products.


During the investigation of the case, in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Foreign Trade Management, the Ministry of Industry and Trade coordinated with relevant units to carefully review and evaluate the impact of the dumping of imported goods on the activities of the domestic industry, the level of dumping of the manufacturing and exporting enterprises of Malaysia and China.

The investigation results show that, although dumping behavior exists, because the rate of imported goods under investigation from Malaysia is insignificant (less than 3%), therefore, according to the provisions of the Law on Foreign Trade Management, the Ministry of Industry and Trade decided to terminate the investigation and not apply anti-dumping measures to some table and chair products from Malaysia.

For the investigated goods from China, the level of dumping was determined from 21.4% to 35.2%, and the import volume of the investigated goods increased both in absoluteness and comparative to the total domestic consumption and similar output of the domestic industry, which is the significant cause of significant damage to the domestic industry.

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and their development to update clients on regular basis.

Source ANT Lawyers: https://antlawyers.vn/library/the-ministry-of-industry-and-trade-applies-anti-dumping-measures-to-a-table-and-chair-products-from-china.html

How Probation is Regulated in Vietnam Labor Code?

 How Probation is Regulated in Vietnam Labor Code?

An agreement between an employee and employer for a probationary position for a predetermined amount of time in accordance with legal requirements is known as probation. Both the employer and the employee should go through a trial period before signing a labor contract to see if they can work together in the long run. The Labor Code and other relevant guidelines should be followed during the probation. The Labor Code 2019 comes into force as of January first, 2020, various new guidelines likewise are given in association with the probation, which each organization ought to audit the matter with labour dispute lawyers in Vietnam for compliance.


Concerning conditions which are allowed to go into a trial contract, this agreement isn't material to the work term which is under multi month. The Labor Code 2012 doesn't need that the trial arrangement should be specified in the work contract. As a result, an employer and employee may negotiate the probation, as well as their respective rights and responsibilities during the probation period. If the parties are in agreement about the probation, they can sign a probation contract. The employer is required to sign an employment contract with the employee if the probation work meets the requirements. It is clear from these provisions that a separate probationary contract between the employer and employee is required.

When the probation period is over and the employee satisfies the employer's recruitment requirements, the labor contract should be signed. Employer and employee may agree on a separate probationary contract or the probation that is outlined in the labor contract, as per the most recent provisions of the Labor Code for 2019. If the labor contract includes a probationary period, the employer is obligated to continue carrying out the current agreement once the employee has met all of the requirements. In that case, a new labor contract must be signed.

Based on the nature and complexity of the job, the Labor Code decided how long the probation period had to be. For positions requiring a college degree or higher, the probationary period was previously limited to no more than 60 days. Currently, executives can extend their probationary period by up to 180 days. The owner of a sole proprietorship, the partner of a partnership company, the chairperson or member of the Board of Members, the President of a company, the President or member of the Board of Directors, the Director/General Director, or the holder of another managerial position prescribed in the company's charter (applicable to the enterprise without state capital) are examples of executives who play a significant part in the business and operation of the businesses.

Another amendment to the cancellation of the probationary contract, the Labor Code 2019 removed the limitation of the right to cancel. Accordingly, during the probationary period, each party has the right to cancel the probationary contract or labor contract entered into without prior notice and compensation. On the contrary, the employee and the employer may cancel the probation if the probationary job does not meet the requirements that the parties have agreed upon under the Labor Code 2012.

The primary purpose of probationary periods is to determine whether an employee and employer are compatible at the outset of an employment relationship. To avoid a potential dispute in Vietnam, businesses as employers must have a clear understanding of the principles of entering into a labor contract and a probationary contract.

Thứ Tư, 10 tháng 5, 2023

When Arbitration Lawyers in Vietnam Could Settle a Dispute?

 When Arbitration Lawyers in Vietnam Could Settle a Dispute?

Under the Law on Business Mediation powerful Jan first, 2011, and other directions, on a basic level, discretion must be utilized in questions among parties that emerge from business exercises, debates among parties something like one of whom conducts business exercises, and different debates among parties which are specified by regulation to be settled by intervention in Vietnam. From drafting the arbitration agreement to resolving the arising dispute, an arbitration lawyers in Vietnam should be consulted.

Arbitral tribunals are entitled to resolve the disputes mentioned above if the concerned parties have a valid arbitration agreement agreed, before or after the dispute arises.

At the point when the court is mentioned to determine one of the debates of the above sorts which a legitimate discretion understanding exists, the court will look at records encased with the request to decide and in the event that the court observes that the question is under a mediation understanding and such assertion understanding is substantial the court will give a choice to end the settlement, return the request and reports.

The question will be dealt with by the court however it is under a discretion arrangement, except if generally concurred by the gatherings concerned or endorsed by regulation: the court gives a choice to dissolve the arbitral honor or the choice made by the arbitral council; or on the other hand there is a choice to suspend the arbitral council or mediation focus from settling questions; or on the other hand the mediation arrangement isn't suitable.

ANT Lawyers, a Vietnam-based law firm, will be available to help clients resolve disputes outside of court, in court, or through arbitration lawyers in Vietnam.

Thứ Hai, 8 tháng 5, 2023

What are the Arbitration Principles of Dispute Resolution?

 What are the Arbitration Principles of Dispute Resolution?

Arbitration, mediation, negotiation, and litigation are all methods of dispute resolution. For disputes to be resolved, a law firm in Vietnam needs dispute lawyers who have the expertise and experience necessary to resolve complex cross-border, commercial, and civil disputes.


The following principles must be followed when settling a dispute in arbitration, according to Article 4 of the Vietnam Law on Commercial Arbitration:

If the parties' agreement does not violate social ethics or prohibitions, arbitration lawyers must respect it.

Arbitrators must be independent, objective and impartial and shall observe law.

Parties in dispute have the same rights and responsibilities. The arbitration council is responsible for establishing the conditions necessary for disputing parties to exercise their rights and fulfill their responsibilities.

Dispute settlement by arbitration shall be conducted in private, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

The arbitral awards are final.

Discretion has turned into a very famous technique for question goal, as numerous organizations lean toward it over the significant expenses of prosecution.

Arbitration lawyers in Vietnam may also be able to assist clients with a variety of issues, including choosing an arbitrator, choosing the rules for the arbitration, selecting an ad hoc or institutional arbitration, selecting a location for the arbitration, and obtaining the enforcement of the arbitral award.